Current Twitter Status

See status in context

Subsidized Fear

Terror Alert Level

Into The Past »

All Items Tagged With “culture” (Subscribe to this tag)

Tweenbots

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Thursday, April 16, 2009 @ 16:12 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

This is a very interesting social experiment being conducted where cute little robots are sent on a mission to reach a certain location, but are dependent on assistance from the strangers they encounter on the way. The reactions people have to the Tweenbots say a lot about us.

From the article:

The Tweenbot’s unexpected presence in the city created an unfolding narrative that spoke not simply to the vastness of city space and to the journey of a human-assisted robot, but also to the power of a simple technological object to create a complex network powered by human intelligence and asynchronous interactions. But of more interest to me was the fact that this ad-hoc crowdsourcing was driven primarily by human empathy for an anthropomorphized object.

Go read the article and watch the surveillance footage (available at the site) of Tweenbots attempting to make their way through the crowds.

View Link Source

Warren Ellis: ‘We’re living in the last days of the Roman empire’

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Wednesday, April 15, 2009 @ 16:15 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

Those of you who already read Ellis’ work will find no surprises in his first column for Wired UK, but this piece is worth reading regardless. There’s a lot of meat in this column, but it would be easy to discount it as simply strange. That would be a mistake, because while Ellis shows us how the world is changing, demonstrating his clear fascination with the bizarre, he begins to make a case for why the slower approach to news gathering and reporting as typified in the print publishing industry is essential in a way that blog networks are not.

For the record, I agree with Ellis on this point, but I wish he had taken some additional time to fully illustrate the differences between the two publishing styles as opposed to assuming implicit understanding of the reader. Although, perhaps that is not his purpose. Like most of Ellis’ commentary, there is mental current to this piece, and getting the reader carried away in that flow of thought usually seems to be more important that knocking off bullet points like some academic. It’s good reading material, and full of Warren Ellis’ wicked (some might say twisted) sense of humor.

View Link Source

Roger Ebert: Hunt not the Snark but the Snarker

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Sunday, April 12, 2009 @ 10:01 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

This post from Roger Ebert about snark both in print and on the Internet is worth a read for all of us, especially those of us that pride ourselves on our wit. You and I may not agree with all of his examples, but it has several core points that are worth considering. It’s not that I (or Ebert for that matter) think that snark should be done away with, it has more to do with confronting the dark intention of snark and understanding that before we engage in it. That dark intention is identified by Ebert as:

[Snark] functions as a device to punish human spontaneity, eccentricity, non-conformity and simple error.

Read it, and let me know what you think. (Comments will hopefully return sometime soon.)

View Link Source

The big blue junk (a “Watchmen” addendum) | The Molly

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Sunday, March 8, 2009 @ 17:20 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

I love this response from Molly Wood to the people complaining about how often Dr. Manhattan’s cerulean genitalia is visible in the film adaptation of Watchmen.

When I saw the movie, there was a father there with his kid (who was probably 14-15 years old), and the kid didn’t seem to have any problem with the rest of the movie, but as soon as Dr. Manhattan’s junk appeared he would always make a little groan and make a production of looking away. Hey, he’s a kid, I expect this from him, but the rest of you complaining? You’re fucking adults, act like it.

View Link Source

Designers and developers: FIGHT! by James Bennett

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Friday, June 27, 2008 @ 10:59 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

Another well-written and insightful post from James Bennett on the ridiculous conflict that seems to spring up between designers and developers. Honestly, Bennett’s writing is so good, you should really just subscribe to him, NOW.

View Link Source

House approves anti-genetic discrimination bill

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Thursday, May 1, 2008 @ 13:46 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

I’m sure at some point as genetic testing becomes more common the insurance companies will find a way around the protections provided by this bill, however this is still great news today.

Oddly enough, Ron Paul was the only member of Congress to vote against it. I’m curious what his reasoning is, even if it ends up being crazy talk, as I see nothing but good in this bill.

View Link Source

Gin, Television, and Social Surplus

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Sunday, April 27, 2008 @ 12:17 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

This is a really interesting piece looking at Social Media and comparing it to the industrial revolution. The point being that during the industrial revolution, one of the most important things was gin, because before people started organizing public works they just got drunk as a way of coping with the sudden changes. The author then observes that in the 20th century we also had a similar coping mechanism to cultural change: the sitcom.

He then observes that similar to how people eventually organized and became involved in the new cultures of the industrial revolution, forming institutions like libraries and museums, and how social media is a beginning of that as culture begins to move from passive consumption to active participation.

I’m still collecting my thoughts on this, as there is certainly a bit of social media kool-aid in there, but the central notion is a fascinating observation.

View Link Source

A Blogger By Any Other Name

Blog Entry posted on Saturday, April 12, 2008 @ 20:44 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

Eric Rice recently wrote this post wondering, “How can I stop being called a ‘blogger’?” To summarize, his issue is that it is ridiculous to be labeled by a single medium, especially when the medium is so prevalent that the term becomes meaningless as a categorization tool.

I just feel that label is more a curse than a blessing. While that mind sound drastic, there’s nothing unique about it anymore if everyone does it. (Which is my beef with social media not really being an industry if everyone supposedly does it– maybe we need a ‘breathing industry’?)

For those of you just joining us, the term “blogger” arose for two reasons, the first of those being medium confusion. Blogs aren’t really anything that radical, essentially they consist of a website with dated entries as opposed to a static site that is rarely changed. Some people have added other qualifiers like suggesting something is not a blog with an RSS/Atom subscription feed, which is actually more of a standard practice rather than a requirement. The point is that the idea-form of a blog is essentially just a site composed of dated text that is regularly updated and archived. You could just call it an online journal, as many did back in the day, except that blogs aren’t always personal, nor are they always a column or essay. We had to call it something, after all, it was new, if not exactly an amazing conceptual leap, and “weblog” (shortened to “blog”) was the one that sticked. Obviously, people who wrote to blogs were called “bloggers” because it’s a hell of a lot easier than saying “person who writes on the Internet.”

The second and the biggest reason that it caught on was the fact that since in the beginning there were so few people writing blogs it became an easy way to stitch together some notion of community, and in its own way, blogging began to consider itself a subculture. This worked out well for professionals and others not involved in maintaining blogs because it provided a convenient label for this group that appeared to be forming. Some used it with derision, others confusion or ambivalence, people who called themselves “bloggers” used it with pride. Thus the term “blogger” received a significance that may not have been deserved.

Because here’s the thing: the community doesn’t exist.

That’s right, there is no such thing as a “blogging community”, just like there is no such thing as a “podcaster community”. It’s not real, it’s like saying that all writers, or all television producers (also a group classification based solely on a type of media), or all electrical engineers are a community working together, which is bullshit. Sure there are communities of bloggers, and communities of podcasters, as well as communities that are composites of every group on the map. Those communities form around shared interests, because that’s how people form communities to begin with.

During the whole O’Reilly “Blogging Code of Conduct” hoopla, there was a lot of talk of “preserving our blogging community” or “how terrible bloggers must be” considering how the whole ruckus got started. And it was all ridiculous. The so-called “community” as a whole didn’t exist. People writing blogs are people, and a significant percentage of people (I choose to believe the minority) are assholes.

So, now that I’ve essentially agreed with Eric Rice that the term “blogger” is an outmoded, and somewhat bullshit classification, where does that leave us.

Nowhere.

Let me explain: like Rice, I don’t necessarily relish being called a “blogger.” First, it’s essentially a meaningless term, having more to do with the type of software I use to publish, than any real connection to my content. Secondly, it adds an unnecessary and weird esotericism to what I’m doing, which means people attach additional rider values with that, either positive or negative, that I don’t particularly want or need. If someone asks me, I say that I am, among other things, a writer. Like Rice, I do have /blog in my URL, because that’s what it is, but in conversation I often just refer to it as “my site.”

All that being said, if people decided that what I should be referred to as a “jackass”, there isn’t anything I can do about it. You can ask politely, you can stop using the terms yourself, but honestly, people are going to call you whatever they want to. All you have a choice about is how you define yourself.

Now, blogs are starting to become more mainstream as they enter pop culture, although if you believe that everyone understands what a blog is you are seriously deluding yourself, and should spend more time with people who aren’t on the Internet all the time. However, there is still a major disconnect between print/broadcast media and online media for the overwhelming majority of people. Until Internet connectivity and consumption of content becomes so ubiquitous that people don’t have that disconnect (which will happen but is a long way off), the term “blogger” or something like it is going to be here.

Which brings us to Eric Rice’s final point and question:

And out there, in scary, scary normal people land, explaining this takes time away from talking about content and talking about definitions.

How can I (or you) talk about the next great idea if we have to spend so much time explaining the lingo?

I think it’s pretty clear that I think the lingo is here to stay regardless of what people want, but honestly it doesn’t help that when bloggers (see I use it too, ha!) attach such importance to it. And, just to be fair, that includes writing posts about whether or not you want to be called a “blogger.” ;-) If you have a problem with it, don’t make it important. You can change the terms you use, or not, it honestly doesn’t matter, and things won’t change until this imaginary community identity begins to leave the public’s association with that word. Identify yourself however you feel most comfortable, but remember that arguing the point either way just strengthens the term’s hold in the minds of your readers/viewers. Labels only have the significance that we (people) are willing to give them.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to take a shower as all this meta makes me feel dirty. :-D

David Byrne: Culture Club

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 @ 17:38 CST by Daniel Andrlik

David Byrne (if you don’t know who he is you have lived a sheltered and sad life) maintains an awesome blog. He doesn’t post often, but every post is well-composed and thoughtful. I’m never sure what I’ll find there as his interests are (as you would expect) eclectic.

This is a really interesting post of his regarding how we define “culture,” using recent research into dolphin behavior as an example. Good stuff.

View Link Source

Creepy Sleepy: Why Radiohead Matters

Blog Entry posted on Sunday, October 14, 2007 @ 16:23 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

Just a quick post to let you know that I appeared on the latest episode of the Creepy Sleepy Show Podcast, where DHP, Greg and myself discuss the new Radiohead album, titled In Rainbows. In particular we focus on Radiohead’s digital distribution, what this means in the music industry and our experience as music consumers.

I do have to apologize for an error I make in the show. I mistakenly described the LAME mp3 codec listening tests as a comparison against vinyl, when I meant to say it was a comparison between a 320 kbps mp3 against the original CD. In my defense, I had just foolishly clicked on a link that Warren Ellis had put on his blog, which was so horrific that I had to restart my brain in order to retain my sanity. Just a word of advice to all of you, when you see a strange looking link on his site, think carefully before you look.

Anyway, it was a fun show and hopefully I’ll have chance to join DHP again soon. You can download/listen the show here.

Into The Past »