Current Twitter Status

See status in context

Subsidized Fear

Terror Alert Level

« The Now Into The Past »

All Items Tagged With “culture” (Subscribe to this tag)

A List Apart: Reviving Anorexic Web Writing

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Tuesday, July 31, 2007 @ 11:26 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

This is a fantastic article, that along with its companion piece, it covers how the influence of business on the web has been reduced from writing to “zombified copywriting.” The author indicates that this is because so many people writing for the web are not writers, but rather engineers, secretaries and designers. I’d argue that this has as much or more to do with the influence of business on the web. The so-called “rules” for writing on the web resemble the soul-crushing tactics traditionally associated with business writing and marketing copy. Obviously, this style of writing has its place, but I agree wholeheartedly with the author that writers and artists have a responsibility to construct the art of this new digital medium “with the same care, deliberateness, and gusto as our traditional media.”

Definately worth a look.

View Link Source

Digg Storm Radio

Blog Entry posted on Wednesday, May 9, 2007 @ 10:50 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

Just a quick post to mention that I’m a guest on today’s episode of the Creepy Sleepy Show Podcast. We discuss the recent HDDVD Digg Storm controversy, Digg’s incompetence at proper PR and the differences between traditional media and social news. I’m always a little uncomfortable being presented as a tech expert, but it was a fun show and a really interesting conversation.

You should check it out. I’d love to hear your thoughts on these issues, particularly to the way social news sites like Digg are changing the way we consume information.

CrunchNotes » My Thoughts On O’Reilly’s Code of Conduct

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 @ 17:11 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

Arrington has it right.

View Link Source

BBC NEWS | Technology | Weblogs ‘need content warnings’

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 @ 16:39 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

There is no way I’ll ever participate in something like this. I run my site, I don’t need a “Code of Conduct” to run things how I want. My site has my own rules. I don’t need some reactionary code of conduct based off of some backwoods notion that bloggers are part of a single community.

View Link Source

Warren Ellis on Blogger Code of Conduct: Oh, Fuck Off

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Tuesday, April 10, 2007 @ 16:36 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

The code of conduct idea is ham-handed and reactionary at best. Warren puts it nicely in perspective.

View Link Source

Quick Post: Body Worlds

Blog Entry posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 @ 11:56 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

This weekend I went to the Body Worlds exhibit at The Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago. It was one of the most amazing things I have ever seen.

For those of you unfamiliar with this particular exhibition, Body Worlds is the brainchild of anatomist Gunther von Hagens, who developed a process called plastination, that allows him to preserve bodies and tissues by replacing water and fat with certain types of plastics. The end result is that the specimens do not smell or decay, allowing detailed study for an extended period of time. Body Worlds is a series of traveling museum exhibitions of primarily human bodies that have been plastinated in such a way to reveal their anatomical structure and thus highlight how the body functions. In most cases, the skin has been removed to reveal the musculature underneath, and in many cases different parts of the body are opened or removed in order to expose or illustrate a particular function. In more extreme examples, the plastinate is reduced to a single system, such as showing just the nervous system or just the vascular system. More dramatic cross-sections also appear to better demonstrate how everything in the body goes together.

I am fascinated by biology and anatomy in particular, and quite happily spent two hours wandering through the exhibit. I was enthralled with getting an opportunity to see the human body up close in this way, being able to see the complex striations and texture of muscle tissue and how the flesh differs in the various parts of our body. It was also a treat to see the brain and nervous system up close, and how they connect to the rest of the structure that is the human form. It is funny how we have a tendency to hold an image of the brain as being far larger than it actually is, such that it is a bit of a surprise when you actually see an open skull. You look at the exposed brain and think, “Wow, that’s it? It’s so small!”

There are three roving exhibitions at the moment, and as I understand it there are plans for even more. Currently they are in Chicago, Dallas and Phoenix, and you can always find out where they are going next at the official site. If it comes near you, don’t miss the opportunity to go. It is really one of the most incredible things you will ever see.

Web 2.0 … The Machine is Us/ing Us

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Friday, March 2, 2007 @ 07:50 CST by Daniel Andrlik

This is just an awesome video on how the web is changing our world. Nothing new in here, but just an awesome presentation.

View Link Source

Boing Boing: Boston LED terror scare: a message to the media

Link bookmarked via Diigo on Thursday, February 1, 2007 @ 21:21 CST by Daniel Andrlik

This sums it up nicely.

View Link Source

Newspaper = Data Warehouse: A Different Sort Of Journalism

Blog Entry posted on Friday, September 8, 2006 @ 00:18 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

Adrian Holovaty, one of the creators of Django (which you will read my raves about again and again), has posted a wonderful meditation on how online newspapers need to change. He centers his thoughts on one central point:

One of those important shifts is: Newspapers need to stop the story-centric worldview.


Holovaty explains quite succinctly how journalists gather structured data every day, and instead of focusing on composing this information into a static story, they should be focusing on storing this data into a machine-readable format that allows the information to be used again and again for a variety of uses, and provides concrete examples why this would be such a powerful and useful change.

For example, say a newspaper has written a story about a local fire. Being able to read that story on a cell phone is fine and dandy. Hooray, technology! But what I really want to be able to do is explore the raw facts of that story, one by one, with layers of attribution, and an infrastructure for comparing the details of the fire — date, time, place, victims, fire station number, distance from fire department, names and years experience of firemen on the scene, time it took for firemen to arrive — with the details of previous fires. And subsequent fires, whenever they happen.

That’s what I mean by structured data: information with attributes that are consistent across a domain. Every fire has those attributes, just as every reported crime has many attributes, just as every college basketball game has many attributes.


Now, if you read his post, Holovaty is really focusing on the ability of the newspaper to “repurpose” their data in order to rapidly develop new and powerful features for their own services, but what excites me about this idea is the potential for marketing that kind of information. Let’s say newspapers take his suggestion and begin specializing in what they do best, the rapid collection of structured data. The journalists will still produce stories (it’s necessary, as Holovaty explains), but the focus of the organization is to fill their servers with as much granular data regarding the event as possible. What if then the newspapers provide an API for other applications or organizations to access that raw data?

I’m not saying that they would give it away for free, quite the opposite. That information in its structured form is worth far more than the articles that it generates due to its re-usability. Charge organizations a subscription fee for direct access to data, and then those subscribers can use the API to develop powerful products and services that the news gathering organization does not have the resources to pursue. Rather than focusing their business on the final presentation of news (although there will still be plenty of that), share the focus with the aggregation of the source data, and then serve as a supplier of that information to other vendors. The possibilities it would open for development are really staggering, and I suspect that data-subscriber revenues for the newspapers would be substantial.

As our demand for online services increases, I suspect this type of model will become absolutely necessary, and it is thus inevitable. If the newspapers don’t go for it, some other business will rise to fulfill the same function. Newspapers have the advantage though, since each newspaper is admirably suited to provide highly specialized data for its location. In fact, it is likely that most of those external developers will need to subscribe to several companies’ data streams in order to get the totality of information needed to meet the demand of a diverse online user base.

Don’t get me wrong, the role and importance of traditional journalism, providing analysis and organizing that data into a meaningful story, will always remain. However, I think if newspapers are to survive this New Media transition, it will be essential to pursue this as a parallel business model. With today’s emphasis on rapid development, the early adopters are likely to net a large number of start-ups as subscribers, and I for one think the sooner they get started the better.:-)

Watchmen: Stan Lee Style

Blog Entry posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 @ 08:39 CDT by Daniel Andrlik

Via Boing Boing:

Just a quick post, but if you are at all into comics you will get a kick out of blogger Kevin Church’s hilarious reimagining of Alan Moore’s Watchmen as if it was written by Stan Lee. It really captures the over-the-top ridiculousness of Lee’s style, which fills me with nostalgia even as I recognize how terrible it really is.

Read the parody here.

« The Now Into The Past »