Skip to main content
  1. Dispatches/

Kris Nóva on Scalable Systems

·138 words·1 min
Quotes Tech
Daniel Andrlik
Author
Daniel Andrlik
Daniel Andrlik lives in the suburbs of Philadelphia. By day he manages product teams. The rest of the time he is a podcast host and producer, writer of speculative fiction, a rabid reader, and a programmer.

I am a firm believer that no system is ever “designed” for the consequences of high adoption. This is especially true with regard to Mastodon, as most of our team has never operated a production Mastodon instance before. To be candid, it would appear that most of the internet is in a similar situation.

We are all experimenting here. Hachyderm was just “lucky” to see adoption.

There is no such thing as both a mechanistic and highly adopted system. All systems that are a consequence of growth, will be organic, and prone to the symptoms of reactive operations.

In other words, every ugly system is also a successful system. Every beautiful system, has never seen spontaneous adoption.

Kris Nóva, Leaving the Basement

Great write up from Kris Nóva on scaling the Hachyderm.io Mastodon instance to 30,000 users.

Related

Vijith Assar on Security Risks from Billionaires
·118 words·1 min
Quotes Tech Security Open Source
Writing for Wired, Vijith Assar raises some excellent points on how bad actors with capital are the most dangerous threat to any system. Capital can kill code. Capital can kill anything.
Quoting Nilay Patel: Welcome to Hell, Elon
·158 words·1 min
Quotes Social Media Twitter Tech
The whole article is 🔥 and well worth a read, but this part of the conclusion hits the crux of Musk’s new dillema. The essential truth of every social network is that the product is content moderation, and everyone hates the people who decide how content moderation works.
Quote: Naomi Klein on AI delusions
·90 words·1 min
Quotes Machine Learning Llm Development Tech
Because we do not live in the Star Trek-inspired rational, humanist world that Altman seems to be hallucinating. We live under capitalism, and under that system, the effects of flooding the market with technologies that can plausibly perform the economic tasks of countless working people is not that those people are suddenly free to become philosophers and artists.